Newton and Neptune

My second post in my series of weekly discussion topics for my Introduction to Astronomy online class.  Last week I got up close and personal with the many sides of the Moon.  This week I take a closer look at the other blue planet in our solar system and how we discovered it without observing it first.

Parting Shot of Neptune as Voyager 2 began journey into interstellar space (Jan 1996)

The image is among the last full disk photos that Voyager 2 took before beginning its endless journey into interstellar space. (NASA Jan 1996)

Why was the discovery of Neptune a major confirmation of Newton’s universal law of gravitation?

Before Newton, astronomy relied on observational data from which mathematical formulae and equations were created. Newton pioneered an approach which allowed mathematicians to extrapolate and predict the movement of objects using three assumptions, now commonly known as his laws of motion. Together with his formula for gravitational force, Newton transformed Kepler’s three laws to predict orbits of comets and other solar system objects. He further formulated a mathematical model, known as the Law of Universal Gravitation, that describes the behavior of the gravitational force that keeps the planets in their orbits. (Comins, 2015, p. 42-44)

Image credit Tony Wayne Jan 2004

Fifty years after the discovery of Uranus (William Herschel 1781), astronomers and mathematicians were “puzzled by quirks in the orbit of Uranus. According to Newton’s laws of gravitation, the path Uranus traveled around the Sun didn’t make sense — unless another, unknown planet was pulling it out of line.” (“Predicting Planets – Sky & Telescope,” n.d.)


At position a, Neptune gravitationally perturbs the orbit of Uranus, pulling it ahead of the predicted location. The reverse is true at b, where the perturbation retards the orbital motion of Uranus. (“Discovery of Neptune – Wikipedia,” n.d.)

“The French astronomer Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier and the British astronomer John Couch Adams independently predicted the existence and position of the planet Neptune using only mathematics—a pivotal event in the history of astronomy. Neptune, whose existence was visually confirmed in 1846, was the first planet to be discovered by mathematical rather than observational means. The discovery of Neptune not only represents the greatest triumph for Newton’s gravitational theory since the return of Halley’s Comet in 1758, but it also marks the point at which mathematics and theory, rather than observation, began to take the lead in astronomical research.” (“Neptune: The First Planet Discovered by Mathematical Rather than Observational Means: Discovered Simultaneously by Le Verrier and Adams (1843 – 1846) :,” n.d.)

Adams’ first attempt in 1843 to calculate an orbit was based on a rudimentary circular one, twice the average distance from the Sun to Uranus.  He recalculated again in 1845, after completing more observations of Uranus.  His second attempt proposed a slightly elliptical orbit.  Concurrently in France, Le Verrier, a chemist turned astronomy assistant, became interested in orbit calculations and excelled at them.  During the summer of 1845, Le Verrier focused his considerable talent on the Uranus orbit problem.  Both mathematicians predictions placed Neptune within one degree (twice the apparent diameter of the Moon) of each other. (Levy & Wallach-Levy, 2001, p. 96-98)

On September 23, 1846 at the Berlin Observatory, Johann Galle discovered the planet, using the predicted parameters published by Le Verrier (Adams did not publish his predictions).  (“Neptune – In Depth | Planets – NASA Solar System Exploration,” n.d.)  In mid-July 2011, Neptune returned to the same location in the sky (with respect to the stellar background, also known as sidereal) and Hubble commemorated the event with these anniversary photos:

Credit: NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

The language of mathematics, thanks in no small part to Kepler and Newton, enabled the scientific method to become an indispensable tool in understanding the universe.  These mathematical methods and laws allow anyone to prove, or disprove, the quantitative predictions of the motion of objects in our solar system and beyond.  (Comins, 2015, p. 46)

Yesterday, Neptune reached opposition and the day before Earth and Neptune were the closest they would be for this year. (McClure, 2017) Annually, this is the best time of year to attempt to observe Neptune, as I tried to do in August 2012, but I lacked a large enough telescope, at that time, to overcome the light pollution from my backyard observation site.

On September 4, Earth and Neptune are closest for 2017. One day later, on September 5, Neptune reaches opposition, when it is 180 degrees from the sun in our sky.


Comins, N. F. (2015). Chapter 2 Gravitation and the Motion of the Planets. In Discovering the Essential Universe (6th ed., p. 42-44,46). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Discovery of Neptune – Wikipedia. (n.d.). Retrieved September 5, 2017, from

Levy, D. H., & Wallach-Levy, W. (2001). 1846: Adams, Le Verrier, and the Scandal Over Neptune. In Cosmic Discoveries: The wonders of astronomy (pp. 96-98). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

McClure, B. (2017, September 4). Earth passing between Neptune and sun | Tonight | EarthSky. Retrieved from

Moss, J. M. (2012, August 18). Fishing for Neptune: Testing the Waters | Misty Midwest Mossiness. Retrieved from

NASA – Hubble’s Neptune Anniversary Pictures. (2011, July 12). Retrieved from

Neptune – In Depth | Planets – NASA Solar System Exploration. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Neptune: The First Planet Discovered by Mathematical Rather than Observational Means: Discovered Simultaneously by Le Verrier and Adams (1843 – 1846) : (n.d.). Retrieved from

Predicting Planets – Sky & Telescope. (n.d.). Retrieved from


About mossjon314159

Avid reader (see my book reviews and ratings here), amateur astronomer and photographer, sporadic crocheter and Rottweiler spoiler.
This entry was posted in Astronomy, Mathematics, Neptune, Science, Solar System and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Newton and Neptune

  1. andreart2013 says:

    Very well written, except for the typo I’ll tell about when you call. Understandable, too. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s